Should separation will inevitably becoming a reality after August 10, again - there would be a repeat of major setback of democracy in this "Bolehland".
Thanks and No thanks to the bickering leaders within People's Justice Party (PKR) which have led to the grand design of "Kajang Plan" (now, it's primary objective has been an open secret) to oust Selangor chief minister (MB) TS Khalid Ibrahim rather than using (state) Selangor as a launchpad to Putrajaya.
Though "Kajang Plan" may not be the absolute starting point to inter-party and inter-power rift of relations, nonetheless, the tussle over the Selangor MB post have, in one way or another, threatened splits, rooting to differences in stance over PKR's plan to replace Khalid with Dr Wan Azizah.
It is indeed saddening when the 52% popular vote majority in GE13 - which in itself promised a "future" for the opposition failed to be privileged to keep the momentum going until GE14.
Absurdity has ruled, plan(s) that they have thought "brilliant" proven otherwise - it backfired and left consequential effect to their party and the pact, and yet - the same leaders are quick at pinpointing others' faults.
Perhaps, the Satan which is now seen successful in it's mission to -
- Rushes You
- Frightens You
- Pushes You
- Confuses You
- Condemns You
- Stresses You
- Discourages You
- Worries You!
With Anwar's political future gloomed with uncertainties following his sodomy conviction other than ageing factor, Lim Kit Siang and Hadi Awang in their advanced ages - it's equally uncertain if they have the charisma and strength to continue leading the opposition's struggle. More uncertain is the succession plan in all the three parties within the alliance pact.
Despite his age "constraints", Lim Kit Siang is seen still "active" mobilising himself to "places" after GE13, while others, seem "fatigued" to carry out the "exercise".
Another fundamental criteria not to be belittled if we talk about "taking-up" Federal administration is, for the three parties to always remain united as a pact , without severe conflicts.
When conflicts continue to ensue, PR would slowly but surely, loosing it's appeal. The current situation especially in Selangor, has given PR the acid test in wooing back the middle voters who, as per popular opinion, started to swing away.
With PAS seen nearing itself towards conservatism, made more prominent by inter-party conflicts, the task of "taking-over" Putrajaya won't be as easy as - ABC.
It's always better of being truthful rather than painting the wrong picture for the very wrong reasons. Like it or not, the "declining" fighting spirit and serious lack of understanding over important issues among PR's leaders had dented the morale of their members.
And whether they like it or not, PR seems to have lost in it's strategies, such that Anwar's grand design of the "Kajang Move," claiming that his takeover of the Selangor MB would serve as leverage to Putrajaya which, more and more have now realised of it's absurdity.
Isn't Umno's stronghold are the Malays scattered in the rural areas all over the country?
Where is the rationale of PR especially PKR to use Selangor as a stepping stone to capture Putrajaya? Is it not the "wealth" which Selangor has that motivated them?
Am I alone here to see a simple "act?"
Would there be surprises when there are segments of leaders, members and supporters, let alone "people" of the opposite divide to disagree?
Don't read me wrong. Until this article is written, my "soul" is still with PR.
If you are observant enough, my blog title is New Malaysia, which simply means new government with new governance.
Like the 52% of Malaysian voters in GE13, I have always looked forward for a new, strong alternative government to steer Malaysia to greater heights, but PR's current state of affairs saddened me, especially in Selangor.
I thought, PR's moving away from race-based politics could have given them the edge only to be ruined by their narrow-mindedness and greed of power.
Khalid has been accused of being stubborn. Refused to follow his party's consensus to give way to a more suitable candidate, who will be able to head PR in Selangor.
Pas president Hadi Awang's open support for Khalid has earned him criticism such as turning his back on the spirit of mutual agreement in PR.
The irony is, didn't these people see what others saw as being inappropriate? They keep harping, without even offering any form of solution.
These people claimed Hadi's stance would disrupt Pakatan Rakyat as a strong alternative to the ruling coalition, little did they realised that Hadi is a president of PAS and is entitled to his own views as the takeover of Selangor MB is a continuation of the failed "Kajang Plan".
Is he not entitled to his own opinion just like others who demand theirs? What more, when many are also against the "Kajang Plan" and takeover of Selangor MB?
Do they expect all to give their blatant nod even to a plan which they saw not beneficial to people and state, except survival of PKR and it's leaders? Carry out a poll. Lets see if all party members in PKR itself are solidly behind the plan.
This is the trouble with politicians. They always say rakyat (people) is the boss! but once they are elected, they do things according to their whims and fancy.
Why must blame Hadi, Nik Aziz or even Khalid if PR coalition is buried? I wonder, why these people are not critical over the "Kajang Plan" now in a shamble?
Despite his age "constraints", Lim Kit Siang is seen still "active" mobilising himself to "places" after GE13, while others, seem "fatigued" to carry out the "exercise".
Another fundamental criteria not to be belittled if we talk about "taking-up" Federal administration is, for the three parties to always remain united as a pact , without severe conflicts.
When conflicts continue to ensue, PR would slowly but surely, loosing it's appeal. The current situation especially in Selangor, has given PR the acid test in wooing back the middle voters who, as per popular opinion, started to swing away.
With PAS seen nearing itself towards conservatism, made more prominent by inter-party conflicts, the task of "taking-over" Putrajaya won't be as easy as - ABC.
It's always better of being truthful rather than painting the wrong picture for the very wrong reasons. Like it or not, the "declining" fighting spirit and serious lack of understanding over important issues among PR's leaders had dented the morale of their members.
And whether they like it or not, PR seems to have lost in it's strategies, such that Anwar's grand design of the "Kajang Move," claiming that his takeover of the Selangor MB would serve as leverage to Putrajaya which, more and more have now realised of it's absurdity.
Isn't Umno's stronghold are the Malays scattered in the rural areas all over the country?
Where is the rationale of PR especially PKR to use Selangor as a stepping stone to capture Putrajaya? Is it not the "wealth" which Selangor has that motivated them?
Am I alone here to see a simple "act?"
Would there be surprises when there are segments of leaders, members and supporters, let alone "people" of the opposite divide to disagree?
Don't read me wrong. Until this article is written, my "soul" is still with PR.
If you are observant enough, my blog title is New Malaysia, which simply means new government with new governance.
Like the 52% of Malaysian voters in GE13, I have always looked forward for a new, strong alternative government to steer Malaysia to greater heights, but PR's current state of affairs saddened me, especially in Selangor.
I thought, PR's moving away from race-based politics could have given them the edge only to be ruined by their narrow-mindedness and greed of power.
Khalid has been accused of being stubborn. Refused to follow his party's consensus to give way to a more suitable candidate, who will be able to head PR in Selangor.
Pas president Hadi Awang's open support for Khalid has earned him criticism such as turning his back on the spirit of mutual agreement in PR.
The irony is, didn't these people see what others saw as being inappropriate? They keep harping, without even offering any form of solution.
These people claimed Hadi's stance would disrupt Pakatan Rakyat as a strong alternative to the ruling coalition, little did they realised that Hadi is a president of PAS and is entitled to his own views as the takeover of Selangor MB is a continuation of the failed "Kajang Plan".
Is he not entitled to his own opinion just like others who demand theirs? What more, when many are also against the "Kajang Plan" and takeover of Selangor MB?
Do they expect all to give their blatant nod even to a plan which they saw not beneficial to people and state, except survival of PKR and it's leaders? Carry out a poll. Lets see if all party members in PKR itself are solidly behind the plan.
This is the trouble with politicians. They always say rakyat (people) is the boss! but once they are elected, they do things according to their whims and fancy.
Why must blame Hadi, Nik Aziz or even Khalid if PR coalition is buried? I wonder, why these people are not critical over the "Kajang Plan" now in a shamble?
No comments:
Post a Comment